The Tremendous TriplexSince Baseball began, the Triple Crown ideal has created a lot of hoopla, especially the batter's version of said Crown; since 1967, when Carl Yastrzemski belted his way into Kinghood, there's been an awed hush surrounding the possibility of another, the belief being that any player that can lead his league in batting average, homeruns & runs batted in should be feted as the ultimate specimen of baseball-playing prowess...though since it's happened seven times since then on the pitcher's side, said pitcher's version doesn't hold quite the same allure: one could gather that leading one's league in wins, earned run average & strikeouts is historically easier than what the batter has to face, using his fine eye to combine a high average with bashing ability. Before I go further, here are those Triple Crown winners since Baseball began (actual stats in the "complaints" section):
Triple Crown - Hitters 1947 Ted Williams 1956 Mickey Mantle 1966 Frank Robinson 1967 Carl Yastrzemski
Triple Crown - Pitchers 1963 Sandy Koufax 1965 Sandy Koufax 1966 Sandy Koufax 1972 Steve Carlton 1985 Dwight Gooden 1997 Roger Clemens 1998 Roger Clemens 1999 Pedro Martinez 2002 Randy Johnson 2006 Johan Santana
These seasons are, one and all, fine examples of baseball-playing superiority...but not necessarily of dominance - and since domination is the ultimate barometre of excellence, well, grab hold of the cape flapping behind my super-heroic Tremendous Triplex and come for a ride through a wonderland of league-leading preeminence of both batter and pitcher.
It should be obvious at this point, I hope, that a batter has no more control over RBI opportunities than a pitcher does in getting the "W" - at least the pitcher can influence which way the win-wind blows, but pitching around a certain hitter shouldn't adversely affect said hitter's season. To counteract this, I looked at who led their league in homeruns, on-base average & slugging percentage, as this better illustrates who is better in the two most valuable aspects of hitting: immediate runs & getting on base. Further still, to retain some sense of the truly spectacular, only hitters who have led the Major Leagues in these categories will be recognized:
Tremendous Triplex - Hitters 1965 Willie Mays 1967 Carl Yastrzemski 1981 Mike Schmidt
As for pitchers, ERA, though flawed, remains...though it is book-ended by WHIP, the best tool to judge how well a pitcher is doing what he's supposed to, which is keeping men off base, and Ks per 9 innings instead of straight strikeouts, as totals aren't nearly as precise as average in determining game-by-game performance. The abomination of "wins" as a stat is thrown directly into the bin of obsolete stats, settling in nicely next to Game-Winning RBI & Stolen Base-totals, leaving us, again, only with the pitchers who led the Majors in these categories:
Tremendous Triplex - Pitchers 1971 Tom Seaver 1986 Mike Scott 1999 Pedro Martinez 2001 Randy Johnson
Seven total (with actual stats also in the "complaints" section), and with the exception of Mike Scott, legends all...though it could be argued that Scott's 1986 season should stand alone as a made-by-Disney movie, as he threw a no-hitter in his penultimate start of the season to clinch a playoff berth for his Astros.
Regardless of Mike Scott's seemingly incongruous inclusion on this list, I believe that you'll all agree that this new "Triple Crown" better measures dominance than its antiquated predecessor; if not, well, too fucking bad.
¶ 11:31 AM
1993 Barry Bonds 46/.458/.677 *before Bonds was a basehead
1997 Larry Walker 49/.452/.720
2005 Alex Rodriguez 48/.421/.610 *Jason Giamboid led league with .440 OBA...however, MLB doesn't yet test for HGH, and as that's the very crack that made Giamboid a basehead, he doesn't matter